The Vegas trip in review.

All right… it’s a slow Labor Day morning, I’m sitting down in the kitchen with my old Compaq laptop (seeing as the Powerbook is elsewhere), and I think I have a few minutes to do an update on what my trip last week was like. That said…

We arrived in Las Vegas early Sunday afternoon, and got our rooms at Bally’s after a bit of trouble involving their misunderstanding of how the comp dollars were to be used. We did some gambling at the slots at both Bally’s and Caesars Palace, and had dinner at the Cheesecake Factory in the Forum Shoppes. After dinner and a bit more slots, I retired to my room to take a nap before hitting the slots again sometime during the night. Unfortunately, the nap turned into a full-fledged sleep, and I ended up waking up at around 5:30 AM.

After doing some checking of mail (and taking a support call from a VP at work who hadn’t realized I was on vacation), I got showered and dressed, and headed down to the casino. As I had expected, my parents were already down there. We ate breakfast at the Sidewalk Cafe, and did the slots some more. From there, we wandered down the Strip to the Venetian to visit the shops there. Problem was, we got there about 9:30 AM and the shops didn’t open until 10 AM. So, after a bit of that, we went over to the new Wynn casino/hotel to see what that was like. After browsing through there (and hitting the slots there), we wandered back to Bally’s. From there, we got on the monorail and separated; Mom went down to the Luxor to get the Blue Man Group tickets, and Dad and I went to the Las Vegas Hilton to see Star Trek: The Experience. We went through the Klingon Encounter ride, and then from there returned to Bally’s. After taking an afternoon nap, I met back up with Dad (who had met up with Mom when she got back), and we headed over to Cheesecake Factory for an early dinner. From there, we went back to Bally’s and got on the monorail, where we headed over to MGM Grand to see the new Cirque du Soleil show, Ka. Ka was a hell of a show; the only disappointment I had was the fact that the soundtrack won’t be available until mid-October. After the show, we headed back to Bally’s for a little gambling, and then off to bed.

The next morning, I was down at the casino at 7 AM, and of course Mom had already been down there for an hour or two. As soon as Dad came down we had dinner at the Sidewalk Cafe, and then did some slots. As soon as it got close to 10 AM, we headed over to the Forum Shoppes to browse around the entire thing and see what the store selection was like. About the only couple of notables were the Sony Style store, and a store with signed collectibles and other stuff from movies, TV, music, and the like. The latter had two locations, and we browsed both. Both stores even had old arcade games; while the second and larger (and original) location only had Ms. Pac-Man and an old pinball machine, the first location we visited had a Space Invaders machine, a Millipede machine, an Atari Star Wars machine, and a Terminator 2 pinball machine. The last one was the one that amused me the most; I felt like asking the clerk/manager if they guaranteed their stuff was in full original condition. If they did, then I would have given them a dressing down. The T2 pinball machine appeared to be in good condition, except for the part of the machine between the actual table and the top display, where the LED display and speakers were. That portion was very obviously originally from a Doctor Who pinball machine. Anyway, from there, we went back to Bally’s for a bit more slots. After another nap, we went to the Cheesecake Factory for the requisite early dinner. From there, Dad and I made our way over to the Luxor to see Blue Man Group. (Mom had seen it last time she was in Vegas with her sister, so he declined to see it this time.) As always, it was a great show. From there, we returned to the hotel, where I watched a bit of TV before turning in for the night.

The next morning, I spent a bit of time packing my stuff, and then wandered downstairs for breakfast. We ate at (you guessed it) the Sidewalk Cafe, and then returned upstairs to finish packing. Once we were packed and ready to go, we went downstairs, checked out, and checked our bags with the bell captain. (Our flight wasn’t until 4:45 PM.) From there, Mom and Dad hit the slots while I found a blackjack table and played there for a while. After we got done there, we wandered over to Cheesecake Factory and had lunch. That done, we went back to Bally’s, got our bags, and headed to the airport. The return home was covered in the previous update.

All in all, it was a fun trip. I did learn my lesson, though: I need to stick to blackjack, as I tend to get raped at the slots and lost a LOT more money off that than I did in the equivalent time in blackjack. I say blackjack, as I really didn’t have a desire to play poker there, and the poker table games didn’t really appeal to me. (The only one I had experience with was Let It Ride, having played it on my PC. I lose money far quicker than I do in blackjack.) Next time I go to Vegas, I’ll definitely play on the tables far more. I’ll also try and do a couple of different shows next time as well. Oh, well… I did enjoy myself, and I’m already looking forward to my next trip. :-)

… what a way to come home.

Yes, I’m back from my vacation in Vegas. I’ll post about it tomorrow or the next day. I don’t feel like doing it right now.

When we got off the plane, we switched on our cell phones, to find voicemails waiting for us. They were from our vet, with whom our pets were being boarded. It turned out that Matey (our black cat, who first came to us as a stray who was hellbound and determined to be our cat) had a severe allergic reaction this evening, and died before they could get her to the emergency clinic.

Obviously we’re devastated by this news. Mom’s going to find out more from the vet tomorrow; he left his home and cell number with Mom, but Mom wasn’t going to call him at this time of night.

We’re going to miss her… :-(

As seen on Jenn’s LJ…


More Emotional

You have:
70% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and
77% EMOTIONAL INTUITION
The graph on the right represents your place in Intuition 2-Space. As you can see, you scored well above average on emotional intuition and above average on scientific intuition.Your emotional intuition is stronger than your scientific intuition.
Your Emotional Intuition
score is a measure of how well you understand people, especially their
unspoken needs and sympathies. A high score score usually indicates
social grace and persuasiveness. A low score usually means you’re good
at Quake.

Your Scientific Intuition
score tells you how in tune you are with the world around you; how well
you understand your physical and intellectual environment. People with
high scores here are apt to succeed in business and, of course, the
sciences.



Try my other test!
The 3 Variable Funny Test
It rules.

My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 56% on Scientific
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 82% on Interpersonal

Link: The 2-Variable Intuition Test written by jason_bateman on OkCupid Free Online Dating

A rant on a web browser…

The following web post and my reply is from Jenn Dolari’s LiveJournal. I hope she doesn’t mind me posting it here, but I wanted to make my reply into a blog entry and I figured she wouldn’t mind if I presented the post to give some context.

Style and comfort for the discriminating crotch!

Websites that “punish” you for using Internet Explorer instead of Firefox or Netscape (usually by putting in malicious “Operation Aborted” javascripts or forcing our CPU cycles to run through the roof while brwosing) usually end with me still using Internet Explorer, and me not visiting your site anymore.

Bleh.

Single-browser support asshattery irks me more than anything else. As the old saying goes, “Code to standards, not to browsers.” It’s rare that I encounter a website that’s IE-only or Firefox-only, though. The only time I have encountered one that affected me was this one banking website I went to that temporarily wouldn’t let me in because it didn’t recognize Firefox and would only allow MSIE or Netscape 6 or higher. They must have gotten a lot of complaints, as that only lasted for a month or two.

As for what happened to you… it sounds like what happened when we first introduced V.7 of MK Online. (MK Online, for those not in the know, uses a CMS/forum/etc. written entirely in-house.) We wanted to add stuff like transparent PNG files and the like so that it would make switching themes and news headers extremely easy and painless for us. The only problem became the fact that even though Internet Explorer was the most used browser on the planet… it was also the only one that didn’t support the features we wanted. During that time CCShadow went from IE’s biggest supporter to its biggest detractor, because he was so pissed off that MSIE wouldn’t support standards several years old that other web browsers did.

Eventually we did keep it the way it was but had the site load a Java library for MSIE users that would implement the functionality that was lacking. However, it made the site run EXTREMELY slowly for IE users, and we got no end of complaints. We finally gave up and had to hack a new system together using ImageMagick that would merge images and whatnot when new headers were created, and get rid of transparent PNG files altogether.

My point is the fact that these websites might not be trying to “punish” you, but actually have good (but misguided) intentions: they’re trying to put their websites together as they see fit but are trying to work around MSIE’s lack of functionality. In the end, hopefully they’ll realize such shortcuts are rather detrimental.

Then again, even more hopefully, MS will put those damn standards in IE7. Personally, I think MS’s monopoly was one of the worst things that could have happened to web browsing. MS never saw a need to add newly developed standards until they got real competition in the form of Firefox, and these are standard that are several years old. The web might actually have been much more advanced than it is now had it not been for IE’s stagnantion.

(Sorry for the long rant, BTW… heh.)

IM discussion…

Well, it appears that Google might be releasing an IM system after all. I’ll go ahead and link to the Slashdot story here, but it appears that it will be based on Jabber, which is an open instant messaging protocol. This should be interesting, as there are already several Jabber IM clients out there, and most of the multi-IM programs support Jabber. I probably won’t get on it quite yet, as one needs a Gmail account to actually use their IM service, and I currently lack one. (I never needed it.)

I’ve actually been using Jabber extensively, myself. How, you might ask? Well… when V.7 of MK Online was being developed, one of the ideas I had in mind was a private IM system. So, Joe and I worked together and got a Jabber server working on the site. I don’t know how popular the IM system as a whole is, mind you, but it’s worked very nicely for me. It’s tied into the site PM system, so whenever someone sends me a PM on the site, I get it on whatever IM program I’m using at the time (Gaim, Fire, or CenterICQ). There’s been a couple of glitches, but on the whole, I like to think it was one of my better ideas.

On the downside, it appears that AOL has been messing around with the TOC servers for AOL Instant Messenger. For those not in the know, there are actually two protocols used for AIM. The one that most of the clients (especially the GUI-based ones like Gaim, Trillian, and the official clients) use is called Oscar, and has all of the nice nifty features. The other one is called TOC, and is a very minimalistic protocol. However, TOC is an open protocol and last I checked is specifically kept open for the outside clients to use. Anyway, CenterICQ (which is the IM program I use at work) stopped working this weekend, and it turns out the TOC servers are to blame. The program naim has apparently gotten a working version going by using an updated protocol called TOC2, but CenterICQ’s lagging behind. (I don’t even think it’s being actively developed nowadays.) So, what I’ve been having to do is use CenterICQ for ICQ, MSN, Yahoo, and MK Online Jabber… and use iChat for AIM. It sucks, but what can I do?

Oh, well… here’s hoping they fix the issue relatively quickly. I’d like to go back to one program for all of my IM needs. In the meantime, I’ll just keep doing what I’ve been doing and work from there.

… of all the series they could put on DVD…

Apparently the late 80s TV series War of the Worlds is coming to DVD.

For those not in the know, it wasn’t really an adaptation of the book so much as it was a sequel to the 1953 film. The series did have its moments, but all in all… I don’t know if it was as good as it could have been. I actually considered the book adaptation of the pilot better than the actual show, due to one detail: in the series, humanity forgot about the aliens and doesn’t believe they existed. In the book, humanity remembers the alien invasion; they just refuse to discuss it and try to consciously bury the past. Also, there was one episode that had a few gruesome spots that I honestly still can’t believe they showed on broadcast TV. (For those of you who remember the uproar about the guy’s head exploding in one episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation… this episode was worse. A lot worse.)

The second season actually was notable enough due to the fact that almost everything from the first season was casually wiped away. All but three characters were killed off, the aliens and their technology was completely revamped (and now almost nothing like the aliens of the original movie), and the setting was completely changed. In fact, now when we see a series almost completely reinvent itself between seasons, I call it pulling a “War of the Worlds”. (The term was originated by the venerable Jenn.) And no, when a series is referred to in that way, it’s rarely a compliment.

It’s sad, too… the second season was decent enough. It just wasn’t War of the Worlds anymore, and it’s likely that discontinuity that killed it.

Ah, well… I may or may not pick it up for shits and grins. I also see Dracula – The Series made it to DVD, and that might be worth seeing just for pure nostalgia (seeing as the series itself wasn’t all that good). We’ll see.

As seen on #mortalkombat…

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/mind/surveys/whatamilike/index.shtml

Your answers suggest you are a Realist

The four aspects that make up this personality type are:
Planner, Facts, Heads and Introvert
Summary of Realists

* Loyal and steady workers who meet deadlines
* Believe in established rules and respect facts
* Think of themselves as mature, stable and conscientious
* May appear too logical or tough-minded and forget their impact on other people

More about Realists

Realists are loyal to the people around them and work hard to keep their promises. They are honest and straightforward with others and expect the same in return. Realists believe in standard procedures and will only support change when there is a demonstrable benefit.

Realists are the most common personality type in the UK, according to a nationwide survey.

Realists respect factual information, which they store up to use when making decisions. This group likes to have time to think quietly and carefully before taking action.

These extremely productive people like to be occupied in their leisure time with pursuits such as craftwork, hiking or reading.

In situations where they can’t use their talents or are unappreciated, Realists may become obsessed with schedules, critical of others or have trouble trusting other people to get the job done properly. Under extreme stress, Realists may complain loudly that events have taken a turn for the worse and predict negative outcomes.

Realists typically only share their opinions or personal experiences with trusted friends.
Realist Careers

Realists are attracted to jobs where decision making based on factual knowledge and experience is required.

It’s important to remember that no survey can predict personality type with 100 percent accuracy. Experts say that we should use personality type to better understand ourselves and others, but shouldn’t feel restricted by our results.